ARTICLE

WH MOVEMENT PATTERN IN THE SPOKEN DISCOURSE OF TEACHERS A SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS

23 Pages : 400-420

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).23      10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).23      Published : Jun 2018

Wh-Movement Pattern in the Spoken Discourse of Teachers: A Syntactic Analysis

    This study investigates the syntactic structures of spoken discourse of teachers in academic discourse. The knowledge of syntactic structure of a language helps in understanding the spoken discourse. So, the study identifies the wh-Movement in the syntactic structures of teachers in English classroom sessions. The data was collected from two universities of Federal government, Pakistan. The one was Air University Islamabad and the second was National University of Modern Languages Islamabad. The data was collected through the recording tool where the English classroom sessions of the teachers were audio-recorded and transcribed. The analysis of data was quantitative and qualitative in nature. The frequency of wh-movement in the structures of recorded English spoken data was analysed quantitatively. In qualitative analyses, the transcribed data was analysed syntactically, keeping in view minimalist perspective, with the help of parsing rules and figures. The analyzed data shows that the teachers at undergraduate level use language where wh-movement is employed in syntactic structure of English used in classroom sessions. They move whexpression into other slots like internal merge and pied-pipe. However, the minimalist parametric unit, wh-movement, was found in the sentence structures of the teachers in the delivery of classroom sessions. So, the minimal pairs of sentence structure impacts different level of language.

    (1) Muhammad Saleem
    MPhil. Scholar (English), Department of Humanities, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (2) Fatima Alam Khan
    Independent Researcher (English), Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
    (3) Aleena Zaman
    Graduate Scholar (English), Department of English, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Abbas, Q., Zia, T., & Khan, A. N. (2014). Syntactic and semantic analysis of Urdu modal verbs using XLE parser. International Journal of Computer Applications, 107(10),39-46.doi:10.5120/18791-0127
  • Abedi, F., Moinzadeh, A., & Gharaei, Z. (2012). WH-movement in English and Persian within the Framework of Government and Binding Theory. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 419-432. doi:10.5296/ijl.v4i3.2325
  • Ahmed, M. (1999). Case grammar and its implications to developing writing skills. Revue Sciences Humaines, (11), 53-62.
  • Batet, M. C. (1993). Children's Yes-No and Wh-Questions. Atlantis,15(1/2), 35- 59. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41054706
  • Bird, C. M. (2005). How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription. Qualitative inquiry, 11(2), 226-248.
  • Btoosh, M. (2010). Wh-movement in standard Arabic: An optimality-theoretic account. PoznaÅ„ Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 46(1), 1-26. doi:10.2478/v10010-010-0001-y
  • Burt, M. K. (1975). Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom. Tesol Quarterly,9(1), 53-63.doi:10.2307/3586012
  • Bybee, J. L., & Hopper, P. J. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure:Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure 45. doi:10.1075/tsl.45.01byb
  • Chomsky, N., & Collins, C. (2001). Beyond explanatory adequacy,20. 1-28. MITWPL.
  • Crowhurst, M. (1980). Syntactic complexity in narration and argument at three grade levels. Canadian Journal of Education,5(1), 6-13. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/149464
  • Gahl, S., & Garnsey, S.M. (2004). Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language,80(4), 748-775. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4489780
  • Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., & Grohmann, K. K. (2005). Understanding Minimalism. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hyland, K. (2009).Academic Discourse. London: Continuum
  • Leech, G. (2000). Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus‐ oriented research. Language learning, 50(4), 675-724.
  • Levelt, W. J. (2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(23), 13464- 13471.
  • Lockwood, D. G. (2002). Synatctic Analysis and Description, A Constructional Approach. New York: Continuum.
  • Lunsford, W. A. (2001). An overview of linguistic structures in Torwali, a language of northern Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Arlington.
  • McSpadden, G. E. (1950). The Problem of Teaching Spanish Syntax. Hispania, 33(4), 347-349.Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/333998
  • Mellish, C., & Ritchie, G. The Grammatical Analysis of Sentences.Retrieved from http://homepages.abdn.ac.uk/advaith/pages/teaching/CS4025/inform ation/gram.pdf
  • Ngangbam, H. (2016). An analysis of syntactic errors committed by students of English language class in the written composition of Mutah University: A case study. European Journal of English Language, Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 1-13.
  • Parvaiz, A., & Khan, M. K. (2010). Syntactic errors made by science students at the graduate level in Pakistan-Causes and Remedies. Language in India, 10(9).
  • PătruÅ£, B. (2012). Syntactic analysis based on morphological characteristic features of the Romanian language.International Journal on Natural Language Computing, 1(4).
  • Perreira, F., & Warren, D. (1986). Definite clause grammars for language analysis. Readings in Natural Language Processing (101-124).San Francisco, US: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Pirie, S. E. (1996). Classroom Video-Recording: When, Why and How Does It Offer a Valuable Data Source for Qualitative Research?Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp.2-14). Panama
  • Radford, A. (2009a). Analysing English Sentences: A Minimalist Approach. New York, US: Cambridge University Press.
  • Radford, A. (2009b). An Introduction to English Sentence Structure. New York, US: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rahman, T. (2003). Language policy, multilingualism and language vitality in PakistanUnpublished Manuscript, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Rose, A. T. (2000). Syntax error analysis as a problem solving technique. 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference Buildng on A Century of Progress in Engineen'ag Education Conference Proceedings (pp. F4B-8). Kansas: Stipes Publishing L.L.C.
  • Sanders, R. (1989). Analysis of students' errors is parser-based writing students of language, Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium Journal, 9(1), 72-89.
  • Sultan, S. (2015). Syntactic Errors in Pakistani Undergraduate Students' Written English. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 3(2), 245-259.
  • Tallerman, M. (2009). Phrase structure vs. dependency: The analysis of Welsh syntactic soft mutation1. Journal of Linguistics, 45(1), 167-201.
  • Zanuttini, R., Pak, M., & Portner, P. (2012). A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 30(4), 1231-1274. doi:10.1007/s11049- 012-9176-2

Cite this article

    APA : Saleem, M., Khan, F. A., & Zaman, A. (2018). Wh-Movement Pattern in the Spoken Discourse of Teachers: A Syntactic Analysis. Global Social Sciences Review, III(II), 400-420. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).23
    CHICAGO : Saleem, Muhammad, Fatima Alam Khan, and Aleena Zaman. 2018. "Wh-Movement Pattern in the Spoken Discourse of Teachers: A Syntactic Analysis." Global Social Sciences Review, III (II): 400-420 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).23
    HARVARD : SALEEM, M., KHAN, F. A. & ZAMAN, A. 2018. Wh-Movement Pattern in the Spoken Discourse of Teachers: A Syntactic Analysis. Global Social Sciences Review, III, 400-420.
    MHRA : Saleem, Muhammad, Fatima Alam Khan, and Aleena Zaman. 2018. "Wh-Movement Pattern in the Spoken Discourse of Teachers: A Syntactic Analysis." Global Social Sciences Review, III: 400-420
    MLA : Saleem, Muhammad, Fatima Alam Khan, and Aleena Zaman. "Wh-Movement Pattern in the Spoken Discourse of Teachers: A Syntactic Analysis." Global Social Sciences Review, III.II (2018): 400-420 Print.
    OXFORD : Saleem, Muhammad, Khan, Fatima Alam, and Zaman, Aleena (2018), "Wh-Movement Pattern in the Spoken Discourse of Teachers: A Syntactic Analysis", Global Social Sciences Review, III (II), 400-420
    TURABIAN : Saleem, Muhammad, Fatima Alam Khan, and Aleena Zaman. "Wh-Movement Pattern in the Spoken Discourse of Teachers: A Syntactic Analysis." Global Social Sciences Review III, no. II (2018): 400-420. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).23